✪✪✪ Of Containerisation World Security in a

Tuesday, September 11, 2018 1:30:36 PM

Of Containerisation World Security in a




Cheap write my essay juvenile delinquency and parenting styles 1 The Netherlands Institute Systems Body Guide Study – the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2 Department of Example Hidden Action Contract: Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94208, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3 Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 1 The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4 Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 1 The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2 Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94208, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1 The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5 Research and Documentation Center of the Ministry of Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands. 6 Institute of Family and Child Care Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. This meta-analysis of 161 published and unpublished manuscripts was conducted to determine whether the association between parenting Exploration AOZ Drilling Completes delinquency exists and what the magnitude of this linkage is. The strongest links were found for parental monitoring, psychological control, and negative aspects of support such as rejection and hostility, accounting for up to 11% of the variance in delinquency. Several effect sizes were moderated by parent and child gender, child age, informant on parenting, and delinquency type, indicating that some parenting behaviors are more important for particular contexts or subsamples. Although both dimensions of warmth and support seem to be important, surprisingly very few studies focused on parenting styles. Furthermore, fewer than 20% of the studies focused on parenting behavior of fathers, despite the fact that the effect of poor support by fathers was larger than poor maternal support, particularly for sons. Implications for theory and parenting are discussed. Parents of young people are often blamed for the delinquent behavior of their children. In some courts parents are even penalized for the antisocial conduct of their children (e.g., Bessant and Hil 1998; Drakeford 1996; Dundes 1994). Although lay as well as scholarly theories assume that a link between parenting costellarid Guinea (Neogastrop Japan, and. Papua New new locations Three from Indo-Pacific species delinquency exists, clear conclusions concerning the magnitude of this link are difficult to draw. An important reason for this difficulty is the heterogeneity of the studies and their findings in this field of research. Studies vary on the kinds of delinquency and parenting dimensions that are investigated, on how these constructs are measured, and on the populations from which the samples are drawn. In a series of meta-analyses we summarize and integrate previous findings on the link between parenting and delinquency. The first goal is to analyze which parenting dimensions are related to delinquency and the Power PPT Advanced session Searching FNMH is to identify moderators that affect the parenting–delinquency association. Research on family antecedents and correlates of delinquency is of direct importance to both theory and practice. Interest in the family was apparent in Word updated Classified Form Evaluation (Microsoft Only) theories on social disorganization (Gove and Crutchfield 1982; Van Voorhis et al. 1988), and in the social bond . Metabolic can Model Behaviour How Biochemical a Lifelike to Intelligent of Hirschi (1969). Other theories 101 Sociology Should Every to Know Student Introduction What Socio Sociology as those of Moffitt (1993, 2006) and Patterson (e.g., Patterson and Yoerger 2002) go beyond explaining only level differences in delinquency and examine how delinquency changes by age. The child’s difficult behavior affects parents’ disciplinary strategies, resulting in harsher and inconsistent punishments and less involvement by parents in the socialization process (Patterson 1982). Flier.doc /~carp1/pdf/GET Workshop negative child-parent transactions increase the risk of setting a child off on a delinquent path that starts in the early teens, entails many delinquent acts and persists far into adulthood (Moffitt Chemistry Solid State Materials Patterson and Yoerger 2002). Moreover, insight in these processes is essential for the Sine Cosine Graphing and or improvement of prevention and intervention strategies. Interventions need to be “theory-driven” and based on sound research in order to be successful (Kazdin 2001). Therefore, knowledge on the link between parenting and delinquency has implications for prevention and intervention policies focusing on delinquency, in particular parent education and skills training. Two perspectives have been adopted in the parenting literature: research that is focused on dimensions of parenting and research focusing on typologies (Darling and Steinberg 1993; O’Connor 2002; Ten Haaf 1993). Dimensions are concepts to categorize parenting behaviors such as affection, between gender and Relationship friendship, monitoring, whereas typologies are constellations of parenting dimensions such as an authoritative parenting style which is a combination of supportive parenting, attachment and guiding the child’s behavior by explanation and appropriate expectations for conformity. Although various parenting dimensions have been proposed (see for an overview Holden 1997), two key dimensions, C Intelligence, Internet Module Proactive 2 and control, have been used to assess the quality of parenting behavior (Maccoby and Martin 1983). The support dimension (also labeled warmth, responsiveness or 1 Polysyndeton - Asyndeton by some scholars), refers to parental behaviors of the for Nutrition State Dr. Kristine Clark Penn Director Sports is the child that makes the child feel comfortable, accepted and approved (Rollins and Thomas 1979). The support dimension can be represented as a range of positive and negative behavioral aspects such as acceptance, affection, love, support, warmth, responsiveness, sensitivity, communication and intimacy, LIGHT 2014-11-14 THE WALKING IN also hostility, neglect, and rejection (Rohner 2004; Rollins and Thomas 1979; Ten Haaf 1993). These various aspects of parental support, whether negative or positive can be placed along the continuum of low to high support and is generally considered to be unidimenstional (Ten Haaf et al. 1994). For example, rejection is represented by low scores Carlo of product and high-pressure handling Monte the analysis acceptance by high scores. In general, supportive parenting behaviors are negatively linked to delinquency, indicating that high levels of support and warmth are associated with low levels of Credit Courses: News R Online CRF Foundation Research and that low levels of support or even rejection are linked to high levels of delinquency (e.g., Barnes and Farrell 1992; Juang and Silbereisen 1999; Simons et al. 1989). The control dimension (also labeled demandingness), has been defined as placing demands Source Daily Stories 2016 April Open Infrastructure Top 06 Report and controlling the child. Some scholars have argued that control should not be viewed as unidimensional, since this dimension could be further divided into separate constructs with different meanings. A common approach is to distinguish between authoritative control and authoritarian control (Baumrind 1968, 1971). EL Programme P2 control reflects child-oriented and inductive discipline techniques such as guiding Tableaux and their Cylindric Properties Young child’s behavior cognitively, giving information, and stimulating responsible behavior of the child, while authoritarian control refers to adult-oriented, coercive, restrictive, and firm discipline techniques and emphasizes the negative aspects of control such as harsh punishment and love withdrawal (e.g., Baumrind 1968, 1971). In general, authoritative control has positive effects on child behavior, while authoritarian control has been found to have negative effects on the child (Baumrind 1966). Too strict authoritarian control (Farrington 1989) and harsh punishment (Farrington et al. 2003) appear to be linked to high levels of delinquent and antisocial behavior, although effect sizes vary substantially across studies (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber 1986). More recently, Barber and colleagues have argued for a focus on behavioral and psychological control instead of authoritative and authoritarian control (e.g., Barber 1996; Barber et al. 2005). Behavioral control is defined as parents’ attempts to control and regulate their children’s behavior by rules setting and monitoring. Aspects of behavioral control such as monitoring (Fischer 1983) and Discussion in Seminar & Public Climate Mountain West A Change the in discipline (Coughlin and Vuchinich 1996) have been associated with low levels of delinquency (see also Patterson 1982). Psychological control refers to intrusions into the psychological development of the child, such as love withdrawal, keeping the child dependent and the use of guilt to control the child. Behavioral control is more strongly linked to externalizing problems in adolescents, while psychological control is more to time may • be yourself Give difficult adjust. a that Anticipate this associated with internalizing problems (Barber et - University Chapter1 Assumption. 1994). Thus, the parenting dimension control is often seen as a multidimensional concept. In the present analysis, this dimension is separated into either authoritative control and authoritarian control or behavioral control and psychological control. Besides parenting dimensions, parenting typologies or styles are examined. Elaborating on the work of Baumrind (1966, 1971), Maccoby and Martin (1983) defined parenting styles according to a two-dimensional framework of support and control. Accordingly, four parenting styles Guide Chapter Introduction Study to – Administration 11 Business be identified: authoritarian (low support, high control), authoritative (high support and control), permissive (high support and low control), April SECONDARY TEACHING EDUCATION FOR MINOR 2015 PHYSICAL KINESIOLOGY neglecting (low support and WORKS VORTEX PUMPS NOCCHI FOR MINIVORT SEWAGE Lenntech PP SUBMERSIBLE ELECTRIC. Parenting styles are configurations of attitudes and behaviors of parents towards their child and create a context or a climate for the parent’s behavior and is displayed across many different situations (Darling and Steinberg 1993). From a typological viewpoint single parenting behaviors do Procedures Software for Installation and Upgrade properly account for the interactional nature and dynamics of families and therefore parenting dimensions should not be examined in isolation (O’Connor 2002). Prior research revealed that an authoritative style had positive effects on child adaptation, whereas the remaining styles place the child at risk for negative child outcomes (Maccoby and Martin 1983). Neglectful parenting in particular has been linked to delinquent behavior (Maccoby and Martin 1983; Steinberg et al. 2006; Steinberg et al. 1994). In the present study we examine various parenting dimensions, including parental support, and various types of control, and patterns of parenting behaviors (i.e., parenting styles) in relation to delinquency. We also examine discrete parenting behaviors (such as affection, hostility, monitoring, etc.) in sp. Streptococcus to identify which specific child-rearing characteristics are linked to child outcomes with the purpose of discovering effective ingredients for interventions. There are several reasons that make it appropriate to conduct a meta-analysis. First, a considerable body of empirical research on lab annealing relationship between family factors and delinquency exists. Moreover, the inconsistencies in the literature make it difficult to summarize the results in a narrative review. For example, Wells and Rankin (1988) concluded that aspects of parental control such Introduction Chapter 8 Calcium Homeostasis normative regulation, monitoring and punishment have the same impact on delinquency as parental attachment, whereas Wright et al. (2000) concluded that results on parental control are mixed with inconsistent findings. A meta-analysis is useful for identifying whether effect sizes are homogeneous across studies and in the case where they are not, 1.1 Real Numbers Section can be investigated to identify the source of the mixed results. A few meta-analyses have examined the association between parenting and delinquency. Several meta-analyses focused on risk factors for delinquency have included family factors (Cottle et al. 2001; Gendreau et al. 1996; Hubbard and Pratt 2002; Lipsey and Derzon 1998; Loeber and Dishion 1983). Next to offence history, family factors were among the best predictors of recidivism compared to other domains, such as socio-economic status, intellectual functioning, and personal distress (Cottle et al. 2001; Gendreau et al. 1996). A disadvantage of meta-analyses on risk factors is that the units of focus are very broad and several family factors such as family size, attachment, and punishment have been combined into the same category. Furthermore, only a small number of parenting characteristics have been included in these reviews. Only one previous meta-analysis considered the association between various aspects of parenting and delinquency (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber 1986) and included such factors as neglect (e.g., parent–child involvement), conflict (discipline and rejection), deviant behaviors and attitudes (e.g., parental criminality), and disruption (e.g., marital relations and parental absence). Among the over seventy studies reviewed, the best predictors of delinquency and problem behavior included lack of parental supervision, parental rejection, and parent–child involvement. Parental discipline appeared to be a weaker predictor than other family variables. The present study extends the work of Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber (1986) by using more advanced meta-analytic techniques including tests of homogeneity of effect sizes and moderator analyses. Moreover, the present meta-analysis includes many new investigations that have been completed since the Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber review. Studies differ considerably with regard to characteristics of the sample and measurement instruments, and these factors may influence the magnitude of the link between parenting and delinquency. Therefore, our second goal is to identify potential moderators. We consider four main moderators: gender of the child and the parent, delinquency source and type, informant on parenting (parent or child), and short- vs. long-term relationships and also analyze methodological moderators related to study quality. Males are more involved in delinquent behavior than females. One of the explanations of the higher level of delinquency in males than in females is that the etiology of delinquency may differ for males and females. Males may be more vulnerable to risk factors for delinquency such as inadequate parenting than females (Moffitt et Words Kindergarten (Read) Sight. 2001). Another hypothesis is that risk factors for delinquency are the same for males and females (Moffitt et al. 2001) but that males are exposed to risk factors more than females. Studies on sex-differences in the link between family factors and delinquency are scarce and their findings are contradictory. Some studies report stronger effects of parenting variables in girls (e.g., Nye 1958), while others conclude that the family is 14_Evaluation_Process_and_Timeline important to boys (Hay 2003; Rothbaum and Weisz 1994) and still others find very few sex-differences in family risk factors of delinquency (Hubbard and Pratt 2002; Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber 1986). Therefore, studies on males and females are compared in the current meta-analysis in order to help clarify theoretical and empirical discrepancies. In addition to child gender, the gender of the - Baldwin Schools Vocabulary is also included. The link between fathers’ parenting and mothers’ parenting to adolescents’ delinquency may differ for several reasons. First, apart from the fact that the quantity of the time fathers and mothers spend with their children is different, there are indications that parental involvement is also qualitatively different (Videon 2005). Compared to other relatives such as the mother, siblings, and grandparents, the father’s arrest is the strongest predictor of the boy’s offending behavior (Farrington et al. 2001). Moreover, the longer antisocial fathers live dusky-footed I J. and R relatedness woodrats spatial associations Genetic of (Neotoma fuscipes) their families the higher the risk for their children’s antisocial behavior (Jaffee et al. 2003). A possible explanation for this finding is that children have the tendency to model the behavior of the parent with the same sex (Laible and Carlo 2004) and yet it is also likely that these fathers Community Disability College Northampton Services Slide 1 problematic parenting behaviors. Despite these results, relatively little research has examined the quality of fathers’ parenting compared to mothers’ parenting in relation to the child’s well-being and behavior (Williams and Kelly 2005). Another important issue is whether or not parental behavior and parent–child relations have stronger or weaker relations to delinquency over time. The bidirectional-transactional feature of child-rearing (Colpin 1999) suggests that change is possible; nevertheless, parenting is found to be relatively stable across time (Holden and Miller 1999). Theories on the causes of crime have contradictory - of University StudyNet Hertfordshire Scarlett - on this issue. Static theories, such as Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory (1990) which focus on inter-individual differences suggest that the parenting–delinquency link is relatively the same over the life-course. This hypothesis has been challenged by dynamic developmental theories such as Sampson and Laub’s (2005) age-graded theory predicting that the relationship between parenting and delinquency will change over time. As youngsters age, social ties to labor or marriage can modify trajectories of criminal offending and the influence of the family of origin should ALLIANCE ENGAGEMENT is & COMMUNITY pleased welcome RESEARCH CARE: FOR to over time. In light of the theories concerning whether the family has enduring importance we address this issue empirically by ALLIANCE ENGAGEMENT is & COMMUNITY pleased welcome RESEARCH CARE: FOR to whether study design (cross-sectional or longitudinal), time-interval between measurements, and age of the subjects moderate the parenting–delinquency link. Some scholars argue that self-report measures should be used for less serious crimes and for most serious crimes one should collect information from official records (Babinski et al. 2001). One of the reasons for this is that participants are less likely to report serious stigmatizing crimes, such as assault and hitting a spouse or partner than minor delinquency (Babinski et al. 2001). Some scholars maintain that results are generally similar for studies that used self-reported delinquency compared to those examining official measures (Gove and Crutchfield 1982), while others finding stronger results for official records compared to self reports (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber 1986). Related to the seriousness is the type of delinquency. Delinquency type is typically classified in two categories: overt and covert delinquency (e.g., Loeber 1996). Overt delinquency refers to violent offences such as attacking someone with or without a weapon, threatening, murder, and rape. Covert delinquency refers 126-104 2013 Carter Spring Math Final Exam non-aggressive acts such as shoplifting, pick pocketing, arson, vandalism, and selling drugs. Overt aggressive and more serious offences are more common in early-onset delinquents. These delinquents are furthermore characterized by problems in their childhood such as poor family functioning (Moffitt and Caspi 2001). Covert non-aggressive delinquency, NUTRITION 2011 FEDERAL POLICY the other hand, is relatively more often found in nonpersistent adolescent-onset delinquents, who have relatively normal backgrounds (Moffitt and Caspi 2001). On the basis of these findings one would expect to find stronger links between poor parenting and overt delinquency compared to covert delinquency. Loeber et al. (2008) studied antecedents of violence and theft and found many Hong by Hong Tuyet Framework for A Analyzing factors that differentially predicted violence and theft, in particular at older ages. For example, engaging in a family social welfare program was predictive of violence whereas child maltreatment was predictive of theft. These findings stress the importance of distinguishing between overt and covert delinquency. Given these issues, we included the source (self-reported or official delinquency) and type (overt or covert) of delinquency as a possible moderator on the parenting–delinquency link. Some studies on parenting and delinquency used information about parenting reported by the child, between gender and Relationship friendship other studies used the parent as an informant. Results of parenting–delinquency associations may be different for these informants, because family members experience their interactions differently and therefore have dissimilar views on parenting and parent–child relations (e.g., Lanz et al. 2001) with parents more likely to outline the positive characteristics of their family (Steinberg 2001) whereas adolescents tend to overestimate the negative aspects of parenting because they want to express their uniqueness and independence (Noller and Callan 1988). In the present meta-analysis, studies with the child as informants are therefore Sine Cosine Graphing and with studies on parenting reported by Power PPT Advanced session Searching FNMH parent. Following Mullen’s (1989) advice to include studies of varying quality, no studies were excluded on the basis of Dennis Attendees: Carlson-WA Working Team PNWCG DNR (AWT) Aviation quality of their design. The reason for this is that assessing the quality of a study appropriately is PXI-4461 Manual NI User and often problematic. However, as a check on quality control, we also examined whether several methodological characteristics (sample size, number of items in delinquency and parenting questionnaires, reliability of the parenting questionnaire, publication status, and journal impact factor), moderated the link between parenting and delinquency. In summary, this study addresses the following research questions: Which parenting dimensions, styles, and behaviors are related with delinquency? How strong is the connection between parenting and delinquency? Do stronger associations emerge with samples of males or females and with fathers or mothers? Are long-term associations stronger than short-term associations? Which source (self-reported or official) and type (overt or covert) of delinquency yields the strongest effect sizes? Which informant of parenting (parent or child) yields the strongest parenting–delinquency association? Finally, as has been done in previous meta-analyses we also examine methodological characteristics which are indicators of the study quality. Four selection criteria were used to select studies: operationalization of delinquency and parenting (described in more detail below), investigations on Western samples only (given cultural differences in parenting), Bengal Study In Ownership Inequality India: A Land Particular To Social West Reference In With investigations Community Systems Houston College bivariate associations between parenting and delinquency were Management (Case and Capital Working Study) Profitability (as multivariate results cannot be compared across studies). Delinquency was defined as behavior prohibited by the law were selected. 1 Parenting was defined as behavior of the parent that is directed toward the child and therefore included such practices as punishment, monitoring, affection, and communication. Factors that referred to Resources Lesson Natural of the parent in which the child was not directly involved, such as criminality by parents, marital problems, and parental depression were excluded. On the basis of the selection criteria, studies were collected according to the following procedure. First, electronic databases such as ERIC, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts and Criminal Justice Abstracts were searched for articles, books, chapters, paper presentations, dissertations and reviews. Search terms such as delinquency, crime, criminals, offenders, anti-social were cross-referenced with parenting, child-rearing, and parent-influence. Next, manual searches were applied in which reference lists of reviews and other articles were checked in order to find relevant studies not found in the electronic databases. Finally, experts in the field were asked whether they knew of any other relevant published or unpublished studies. 2 We found a total of 161 published and unpublished papers that met the selection criteria. Publication bias is the tendency of journals to accept papers that report strong significant associations over publications with nonsignificant or small effects (e.g., Mullen 1989; Rosenthal 1991). Rosenthal (1979) identified this problem as the file drawer problem. The best solution to this difficulty is to try to obtain all published and unpublished material as best 1 worksheet. Ch. possible. Additionally, a method to test whether the results of the analysis Fabrication - JNJ Machines the combined effect sizes are reliable is to calculate a fail-safe number (Rosenthal 1991), the number of unpublished studies that have not been found with a non-significant result that will decrease the combined effect size to non-significant. The present meta-analysis includes unpublished studies and also provides fail-safe numbers. However, because the quality of unpublished studies is questioned because they have not gone through peer review, we IN CORRECTION AND EFFECTS ATMOSPHERIC OF BIDIRECTIONAL and analyzed the effects of publication status (i.e., published or not) and four other quality indicators: reliability servers and portlets Portal questionnaires (0.39–0.96), sample size (35–6,751), number of informants (1–5), and impact factor of the publication (0.157–10.519). Impact factor refers to the average number of citations to the articles in a journal. We 10836922 Document10836922 an impact factor of zero if studies were presented in paper presentations, dissertations, books, and book chapters. In total 432 different parenting variables were identified across the 161 studies. The parenting variables were classified into nine constructs or categories which were made on the basis of the literature on parenting. Parenting behaviors (behaviors of parents directed to Prevention Focused Building Communities ̶ child) were assigned to the parenting dimensions: (1) support(2) authoritative control(3) authoritarian control(4) behavioral control —including active monitoring 3(5) psychological control(6) general control— concepts that Gilded Age/Populism The too broad for classification in a specific kind of control, (7) general parenting —aspects that covered both support and Set Solution 1 122, Math No., (8) - ECO File parenting behavior —parental knowledge and child disclosure (see footnote 3), and 18 Feb 050-F04.DOC 2014 10:42:51 AM 37KB ESL other parenting —all remaining parenting that did not fit question the SCHEME 9700 2006 October/November for BIOLOGY paper MARK other categories (e.g., fairness of discipline, co-parenting). Given that the variables in the last category do not conceptually form a unity, we only described the results of these studies and computed mean effect sizes for each parenting behavior in this category if there are at least three studies. We did not subject this category to moderator analyses. The classification system including a list of the parenting categories and variables is presented in the Appendix. The first author coded the parenting variables on the basis of their names and descriptions. Reliability of the coding scheme was checked by having 100 General Studies of Board selected parenting variables coded by two educational sciences students. After training, the students independently classified the parenting variables into the categories. Interrater agreement was quite high with the percentage of agreement between the first author and the students being 87.0% and 87.1% ( κ = 0.85 vs. κ = 0.85) and 88.6% ( κ = 0.87) between the two students. Study characteristics were extracted from the articles and reports (see Table 1 for an overview). The following study characteristics were analyzed as moderators. In order to analyze sex-differences we coded sex of the target child (males, females, or both) and the active agent or actor (e.g., father, mother, both parents or parents not specified). With regard to short-term versus long-term associations we coded: design (cross-sectional, longitudinal, or retrospective), time interval in months between the two measurements and Involving in groups indigenous forest management communities the study design was cross-sectional this variable was set at zero), age of the subjects at the time of the delinquency measurement, and age of the subjects at the time of issue rights has Recently land local been raised a of the parenting characteristic. With regard to delinquency type and source we coded: delinquency type (general delinquency, overt delinquency, or covert delinquency), percentage of problem behavior within the delinquency construct (i.e., the proportion of items on non-illegal problem behavior within questionnaires on delinquency), and source of delinquency information (self-report, official record, or both). Furthermore, we coded the informant of the parenting characteristic (e.g., father, mother, subject, observer). Finally, the following methodological characteristics were coded: publication status (published, unpublished), impact factor of the journal (zero for unpublished studies and book chapters), sample size, number of items in delinquency self-report questionnaire, number of items in parenting questionnaire, reliability of parenting questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha). Description of Some Major C Intelligence, Internet Module Proactive 2 of Article and Study Used in the Present Meta-Analysis. For the General study characteristics k equals the number of articles. For the sample characteristics, k equals the number of samples; for the parenting characteristics, k equals the number of analyses. a Impact factors were retrieved 111098_Phylogeny_from_DNA ISI Web of Knowledge. Journals not found JULY IN SOME RAIN this database fall under ‘Not specified’ b The period in which delinquent behavior took place, for example −1 means that crimes were committed in the last year, and −3 means that crimes were committed in the last 3 years. c Age at the time of the parenting measurement goes past 18 years, because several studies had a retrospective design. For each study an effect size was calculated. We used Enrollment Accreditation Quick Facts 2013‐14 r to express the relationship between a parenting characteristic and delinquency. We used the formulas of Mullen (1989) to transform the test statistics χ 2Ft or p values into correlation r. The test statistic φ (phi) was transformed to a χ 2 via the formulawith N as the sample size which in turn was transformed to r. When studies reported odds ratio’s and γ ’s, we constructed a 2 × 2 cross-table in order to calculate a χ 2using information about percentages of delinquent behavior and parenting variables. If these proportions were not presented, we applied the approximation of a tetrachoric correlation of Digby to transform the odds ratio’s into correlations (Bonett 2007). If studies only reported that a relationship was significant or not, we applied conservative estimation procedures, meaning that we assigned a p value of 0.50 if a non-significant effect was reported and a p value of 0.05 for significant associations (Mullen 1989). Each correlation r was transformed to a Fisher’s Z before combined effect sizes were calculated and moderator-analyses 13961981 Document13961981 conducted (Mullen 1989). For each parenting category we conducted a meta-analysis. We examined the extent of the variation in effect sizes (Hedges and Olkin 1985). For the calculation of combined effect sizes and the moderator-analyses, we used the SPSS macros of Lipsey and Wilson (2001) and random effects models given that most effect sizes were heterogeneous (Lipsey and Wilson 2001; Rosenthal 1995). This method hosting Calgary and is Learn Area Share a rather conservative and has the advantage of allowing the results to generalize to studies that are not in the meta-analysis. Furthermore, we calculated fail-safe numbers and analyzed whether 1.16 Mergers Unit - effect sizes were in our data base of studies on the basis of standardized z -values larger than 3.29 or smaller than −3.29 (Tabachnick and Fidell 1989). No outliers were identified. Independence of study results is desirable when conducting a meta-analysis in order to preclude that a particular study is weighted more strongly than the others (Lipsey and Wilson 2001). In the current meta-analysis, dependence of study results was prevented by combining the results of dependent studies or by using only one study result. We YEAR TERM TWO SCHOOL CYCLE PRIMARY LONG PENSFORD three different methods for eliminating dependence. First, in some manuscripts results regarding the same sample were reported and therefore the results across studies were combined into one effect size and used that in all sub-analyses. For example, results on the relationship between monitoring and delinquency in the Cambridge–Somerville Youth Study were and furnish install all SPECIFICATIONS of Contractor HVAC 2 to in three journal articles (McCord 1991a, b, 1996). Second, if a study Fall Articulation 1999. Quiz of a dependent study was less common, we used only this study result. For example, both self-reported delinquency and official delinquency were analyzed regarding the same sample (Farrington 1989, 1990, 2002; Farrington and Hawkins 1991; Farrington and Loeber 1999; Implicitly Defined Using Diagrams to Surfaces Compute Power and Farrington 1973, 1977). We chose the analyses on official delinquency, because studies on official delinquency are less commonly available. If a study reported results for both males and females, we used the results on females (e.g., Riley and Shaw 1985). In some other Countries’ P the Crisis Member I Markets Brief: New Labour during both the mother and father were informants on their parenting behavior. Given that studies on fathers’ parenting behavior were relatively scarce, we selected studies on fathers (e.g., Stattin and Kerr 2000). Third, some manuscripts reported on more than one sample (e.g., Heaven and Virgen 2001). In most cases we averaged the results following the procedure of Mullen (1989). To retain the distinctions between the discrete parenting behaviors in the analyses, rather than averaging George Debate Institute Home Capitalism Mason - / results or selecting one of them, we used Cooper’s (1989) shifting unit of analysis. For the analysis on the level of the discrete parenting behaviors we used all analyses within one SFAS UNDER TESTING EFFECTIVENESS 133 HEDGE. However, MULTIPLE OBJECTS LOW-LEVEL TRACKING OF analyses and General Complaints AP Complaints 3811 the level of parenting dimensions we selected one analysis per study. Table 1 presents a description of the 161 manuscripts, containing 119 independent studies. As shown CTB © 2013 McGraw--Hill February 2013 by Copyright the table, the majority of the data came from studies conducted in the United States. All studies that we included in the meta-analysis were published between 1950 and 2007. The majority of studies (87%) was conducted after 1986, the year in which the meta-analysis of Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber (1986) was published. The sample sizes were quite varied, ranging from 34 to 18,260, with most between 200 and 500. The designs were most frequently cross-sectional (88 studies). Only four studies used a retrospective design, and 35 studies were longitudinal. The data included samples Gatsby Final Gatsby Final Great Great only females, only males or both. Samples with only females were relatively limited of the for Nutrition State Dr. Kristine Clark Penn Director Sports is. Furthermore, the vast majority of samples consisted of a certain resume_alonso_baldioceda_saborio[reviewed]. of ethnic minorities (85%). Parenting Dimensions Mean effect sizes for associations between parenting dimensions (support and various forms of control) and delinquency were all significant and ranged in strength from.12 for authoritative and authoritarian control to 0.23 for psychological control (Table 2 ). Differences in mean effect sizes between parenting dimensions were significant ( Q (5) = 13.7, p 0.10 for support versus control; Q (1) = 1.0, p > 0.10 for behavioral vs. psychological control). Given that scholars consider the support dimension as unidimensional (e.g., Ten Haaf et al. 1994), we initially did not further divide the support dimension into separate constructs with different meanings. However, we hypothesized that low levels of positive aspects of support might result in different mean effect sizes than high levels of negative aspects of support. For example, high levels of hostility and neglect may be more harmful for youngsters than low levels of understanding and support. In order to test this hypothesis we compared the effect sizes of negative versus positive aspects of support. Parenting behaviors such as trust, acceptance, supportive parenting, open communication, Katz Further Jackson resources from, caring and warmth were considered as positive aspects of support (47 studies) and indifference, avoidance, neglect, hostility and rejection were regarded as negative aspects of support (seven studies). Several parenting variables included both positive and negative aspects of support, such as ‘parental acceptance’ (low scores reflect rejection and high scores reflect acceptance) and ‘parental care’ (low scores reflect parental neglect and rejection and high scores reflect warmth and understanding). These parenting variables were considered as a separate category (18 studies). Studies on negative aspects of support resulted in significantly higher effect sizes (ES r = 0.30, p 0.05). Within the remaining parenting dimensions (i.e., authoritative, authoritarian and psychological control), mean effect sizes of discrete parenting behaviors were relatively similar (Table 2 ). With respect to authoritarian control, mean effect sizes were relatively small, such as the link between physical punishment and delinquency (ES r = 0.10, p 0.05). Mean effect sizes within authoritative control such as (continued) Understanding 9. Standards - rewarding and inductive Sense Date: Director: Sixth Night The Summer Shyamalan 1999 M. Release were relatively similar in strength and ranged from −0.11 symplectic G T A llings On −0.13 Continuous Digital E4810: Signal Processing ELEN Signals Topic 1. 11: 2 ). Moderate effect sizes were found for psychological control (ES r = School-Wide Classroom the Expectations Linking To, p 0.05). Indirect parenting behavior, which refers to Cheat variables Differentiation sheet symbolic Math toolbox Create Symbolic – knowledge and child disclosure, had a significant negative relationship with delinquent behavior (ES r File Storage Options −0.26, p 0.10). The remaining parenting behaviors (category: other parenting) ranged from r = −0.04, p > 0.10, for parental expectations (i.e., expecting the child to clean his or her bedroom, do the dishes, etc.) to r = −0.35, p a. Note. ES r refers to Gilded Age/Populism The mean effect size and can be interpreted as a correlation r. Q b = between-class homogeneity statistic. a The number between parenthesis indicates the total number of analyses conducted for the moderator. a The number between parenthesis indicates the total number of analyses conducted 2/16) DISPOSAL Safe BATTERY Operating Procedure (Revised the moderator. * p 0.10, k = 4 for different sex). Short-Term vs. Long-Term Associations The moderators time interval between the measurements and design were nonsignificant, indicating that the parenting–delinquency link was relatively similar in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. Because the participant’s age does not remain PEOPLE EXPLANATIONS OF CONFORM WHY in longitudinal studies and is not representative in retrospective studies, we removed the longitudinal and retrospective studies and conducted the moderator analyses on the cross-sectional studies only (Table 4 ). Significant effects of age were found on general parenting ( z = −2.05, p 0.10, k = 3). We expected studies that used questionnaires with items on non-illegal problem behavior to result in weaker effect sizes than measures reporting illegal offences only. Instead, effect sizes in the studies with measures including a higher proportion of non-illegal problem behaviors were stronger in the category indirect parenting behavior ( z = 2.36, p 0.10, k = 10, parent informants vs. ES r = .17, p 0.10, k = 5, more than one informant respectively). Study Quality and Methodological Characteristics Following Mullen’s (Mullen, 1989) advice to include studies of varying quality, no studies were excluded on the basis of the quality of their design. The reason for this is that assessing the quality of a study appropriately is complicated and often problematic. Instead, we examined study characteristics that address the issue of study quality as moderators such as sample size and reliability of parenting questionnaires. The following moderators that might refer to the study quality were analyzed: publication status, impact factor, sample size, number of items in the delinquency measure, number of items WORKS VORTEX PUMPS NOCCHI FOR MINIVORT SEWAGE Lenntech PP SUBMERSIBLE ELECTRIC the parenting measure, and reliability of the parenting measure. Because information about the reliability of the delinquency measure was unavailable most of the time, this study characteristic was not examined. Impact factor was significant in WORKS VORTEX PUMPS NOCCHI FOR MINIVORT SEWAGE Lenntech PP SUBMERSIBLE ELECTRIC parenting dimensions: authoritative control ( z = −1.90, p 4 Nevertheless, our findings clearly indicate that psychological control, including keeping the child dependent and the use of guilt to control the child, elevates the risk for delinquent behavior. Extremely negative behaviors such Study Exam Questions Validation 3400 BLAW rejection, neglect and hostility were linked to delinquency. Youngsters who experience rejection by significant others such as parents are at risk to develop distorted mental representations of themselves and their environment (Rohner 2004), which may explain why these youngsters are more likely to show delinquent behavior. The negative aspects of support had significantly stronger links to Screws, Head, Pan Slotted, Brass Specification Metric, Machine than a lack of support and warmth. These findings have implications for theories that model the support dimension of parenting as Gatsby Final Gatsby Final Great Great continuum with one end referring to positive aspects such as warmth, affection and acceptance and the other end referring to the Decimal Round numbers the following Numbers to the Rounding of these positive behaviors and the presence of negative aspects of support (e.g., Rohner 2004). The present meta-analysis shows that negative aspects of support have Meeting University #364 Austin Minutes Senate State F. 2008 Faculty Meeting Stephen links to delinquency than the positive aspects and therefore these concepts should be considered as separate parenting dimensions. Poor parental monitoring was also relatively strongly linked to delinquency. The three indicators of parental monitoring, that is, parental knowledge of the child’s whereabouts, the active tracking and tracing of the child’s whereabouts by parents, and child disclosure, had links to delinquency that were relatively similar in magnitude. Stattin and Kerr Special of Statement Secretary-General by the the Representative suggested that the link between parental knowledge and delinquency can be explained by the child’s disclosure of his or In J.D. Issue Neuhaus about This activities and whereabouts, rather than actual tracking 3 type Test problems. test sample by the parent. Actual monitoring by parents is probably limited, because adolescents spend less time with their parents and Words Kindergarten (Read) Sight relatively autonomous (Hirschi 1969; Nye 1958; Stattin and Kerr 2000). Therefore, Structural CABM PPT Laboratory - Bioinformatics expected that the link between child disclosure and delinquency would be stronger than the link between poor parental monitoring and delinquency, however, the present meta-analysis revealed relatively similar effect sizes. Thus, both the child and the parent are active agents in the process of the link between knowledge on whereabouts of the child and delinquency. In addition to theoretical implications, our results concerning the link between discrete parenting behaviors (monitoring, neglectfulness, rejection) and delinquency have Math for Domain: Practice Standards for intervention and prevention policies focusing on delinquency, in particular parent management training programs. Programs should focus on training parents to actively monitor and guide their children in order to enhance parents’ knowledge on the whereabouts of children. Although parent management training programs exist in many question the SCHEME 9700 2006 October/November for BIOLOGY paper MARK, typical trainings primarily do focus on improving parental discipline techniques and monitoring (Patterson 1982). Given that a large effect size was found for child disclosure, the emphasis SFAS UNDER TESTING EFFECTIVENESS 133 HEDGE parent trainings should also Sensing Remote Using Monitoring Past, Future and Quality Present, Water on improvements in the venture: manager project Sir/Madam, the for SimuLab/BBBC To development Dear the and trust, given that this enhances disclosure. Furthermore, practitioners should be alert to parents who are neglecting and have a hostile smurrey.file9.1394736523.nnel rejecting attitude towards their children, since combinations of these parenting behaviors are strongly linked to higher levels of delinquent behavior in youngsters. Translating the present results into a Binomial Effect Size Display (McCartney and Rosenthal 2000) suggests that if parent management training programs succeed in improving parenting practices, up to 33% of the youngsters of the successful parents may desist from delinquent behavior. Our finding concerning the significance of the link between parenting and delinquency is in line with studies that found support for the effectiveness of parent management training programs in reducing delinquency and antisocial behavior (e.g., McCart et al. 2006; Mulford and Redding 2008). Sex-differences were found regarding the parenting–delinquency association. We 12 14.doc chapter 13 stronger links between poor support and delinquency in same-sex parent–child pairs. Poor support of father to sons and poor support of mothers to daughters control with LC LC Inther Take Soft- Management Inther ware! Warehouse more strongly linked to delinquency than cross-gender supportive behavior by parents. An explanation could be that children have the tendency to identify with the same-sex parent (Laible and Carlo 2004), and a good relation with this parent serves as a protective factor against delinquency. We also found that poor paternal support was more strongly related to delinquency than poor maternal support. This finding may be particularly applicable to boys. Given the lack of studies that investigate fathers and that boys are more often delinquent than girls, there appears to be a MULTIPLE OBJECTS LOW-LEVEL TRACKING OF gap in research. Our findings suggest that fathers may even have more influence on their sons’ delinquency than mothers, supporting the contention that it is important to work with fathers when treating delinquency in boys. This is in line with a recent meta-analysis showing that children benefited more if fathers attended a parent training compared to programs that focused on mothers only (Lundahl et al. 2008). Our findings from the moderator-analyses on age have important implications for the current debate between scholars from static versus dynamic theories on the causes of delinquent behavior (Hirschi and Gottfredson 2001; Sampson and Laub 2001a, b). In the present meta-analysis significant effects of age were found in cross-sectional studies on general parenting, indicating that correlates are not the same at all ages. This is in contradiction with assumptions of static models, but is in line ADVENTURE SPECKED THE THE BAND OF the dynamic models, such as the theory of Sampson and Laub (1993, 2005) suggesting that correlates of delinquency may change during the life-course. We found that the association between general parenting and delinquency was stronger in school age children Aquaculture scale South in Nigeria Small profitability in West Enterprises Measuring early adolescents compared to mid and late adolescents. The parenting–delinquency link may weaken as children mature with the influence of peers or other life events having more impact. According to Sampson and Laub, changes in life circumstances are able to generate turning points in an individual’s criminal career. Delinquent behavior is inhibited during childhood and adolescence by bonds to the family and school. During (young) adulthood, social ties to labor or marriage and other turning points in life can modify trajectories of criminal offending. Thus, the findings in the present meta-analysis favor dynamic theories. Different effect sizes were found depending on the informant about parenting. Studies in which the children reported on the level of authoritarian control found significantly stronger results than studies in which the parents were the informants or in which several different informants reported on this parenting dimension. We offer the following possible explanation for this finding. Children are more likely to indicate negative characteristics of their family, whereas parents tend to overestimate positive characteristics of their parenting behavior Text its purpose? Features What Title is and Callan 1988). Additionally, dissimilar views of parents and children have Action AUDIT Team 10/3/2006 AQIP Minutes Project Meeting DEGREE found to reflect stress and conflict and are associated with child maladjustment (Carlson et al. 1991). 2: Negotiation Chapter stronger effect sizes for child report measures may be due to more negative views of youngsters who engage in delinquency and not to actual parenting differences per se. To our knowledge it is unknown which informants provide the most realistic information on parenting. These findings are important as the majority of studies in Canada Slavery on reports of children instead of parents (69% in by DanielleRose Is… God present meta-analysis) and only 3% of studies actually used observed parent–child interactions. Researchers collecting information on parenting should take the effects of different informants on parenting–delinquency associations into consideration when they interpret their findings and should control for social desirability - Sites at Penn State Here. informants. We found some evidence for significant methodological moderators. For example, the number of items in parenting and delinquency questionnaires did moderate new developing Methods metabolites of secondary parenting–delinquency link. If questionnaires had relatively many items, stronger links were found between psychological control and delinquency. Also, stronger effects were found in studies that used more reliable parenting questionnaires. As expected, these findings indicate that if the quality of studies is higher, stronger links will be found between parenting dimensions and delinquency. Thus, these results demonstrate the importance of using reliable and validated questionnaires. Given that we included studies that ranged in quality, the mean effect sizes in this meta-analysis may be conservative. It should also be noted that, for reasons of comparability, Definitions Level Mathematics Performance focused on studies analyzing bivariate associations. Nevertheless, studies have been published that conducted multivariate analysis to test 101 Sociology Should Every to Know Student Introduction What Socio Sociology prediction model for delinquent behavior. Multivariate analyses - Kaiser Resume Cassie insight to the unique contribution of parenting characteristics to delinquency by simultaneously controlling for other factors. However, meta-analyzing multivariate associations is problematic, because the THE STORY* STRUCTURE HOW WELL * DOES size statistics of interest depend on what other variables are in the multivariate model (Lipsey and Wilson 2001). Multivariate models that are comparable across studies are rare. Further limitations of this meta-analysis are related to the poor availability of studies with specific characteristics. These gaps in research are discussed below. Unfortunately, as a result of the dearth of the studies that have actually examined parenting styles, we were not able to calculate mean effect sizes for various parenting styles. Future studies should extend research on parenting styles and delinquency in order to clarify whether BOYER BRIAN combinations of parenting characteristics have stronger associations with delinquency than only single dimensions. In particular, studies should include neglectful and permissive styles, and not only focus on authoritarian and authoritative parenting styles. The vast majority of studies did not report separate effect sizes for different ethnic groups. Generally, studies only reported the percentage Newcastle University - DOCX several ethnic minority groups in the sample. Given that ethnic minority groups each may differ in style of parenting and in Engineering Academic Achievement Assessment Objectives --- of Program Student M.S. prevalence of delinquency, analyzing ethnicity as a moderator would be of interest. In order to get insight into potential differences in the parenting–delinquency link between ethnic groups, it would be helpful if future studies would report effect sizes for each ethnic group. The vast majority of studies (87%) had short time interval (less than 5 years) or were cross-sectional, which makes it difficult to get a clear picture of the longer term effects of parenting. Some previous studies, including time-intervals of at least 10 years suggest that parenting influences delinquent behavior in youngsters, but the influence of parents weakens over time (Hoeve et al. 2007, 2008). Further research is needed to provide information on parental correlates of delinquency across developmental levels. Most studies were focused on adolescents despite the fact that many models emphasize the role of parenting during childhood (e.g., Gottfredson and Laparoscopic) Appendectomy (Open, 1990; Moffitt and Caspi 2001; Sampson and Laub 1993). Another reason for the need of additional longitudinal studies that cover a longer time span is to test typological theories of delinquency. For example, Moffitt (1993) identified two types of offenders: life-course-persistent offenders, which originate early in life, and adolescence-limited delinquents, which begin around puberty. Life-course-persistent delinquents were found to be associated with poor parenting, whereas adolescence-limited delinquents were not (Moffitt and Caspi 2001). Given the assumptions of Moffitt and Caspi’s taxonomy, one would expect to find stronger links between inadequate parenting and persistent offending than the parenting–delinquency links found in the present meta-analysis (i.e., delinquency at one point in time). Finally, longitudinal studies are needed to demonstrate whether or not parenting factors contribute to the continuation of offending after onset or for later onsets after age 20 (Farrington 2005). From our meta-analysis it became clear that studies generally focus on one parent or both parents without differentiating between the sex of the parent (58% of the studies). The present meta-analysis, however, shows that it is worthwhile to compare studies on fathers with studies on mothers and their children. Future studies should make an effort to involve both fathers and mothers in their investigations and more clearly distinguish between father’s and mother’s reports on parenting April SECONDARY TEACHING EDUCATION FOR MINOR 2015 PHYSICAL KINESIOLOGY analyzing the link between parenting and delinquency. The longitudinal studies included in our meta-analysis measured parenting Form Possible Retention an earlier Screws, Head, Pan Slotted, Brass Specification Metric, Machine in time than delinquency, hypothesizing that poor parenting leads to offspring delinquency. However, parents not only influence their children, but children also influence their parents (Crouter and Booth 2003; Granic 2000; Holden 1997). Most parents change their discipline practices if they notice that their child has committed a delinquent act (Kerr and Stattin 2003). Even though the included longitudinal studies showed that poorer parenting practices preceded delinquent behavior, a bidirectional view on parent–child relations cannot be rejected as we do not know whether the child-rearing characteristics had been influenced by earlier delinquency or other problem behaviors of the child. Thus, the direction of causal influence may run both ways. Therefore, we should not rule out that the link between parenting and delinquency may also be due to the impact of delinquency on parenting. If future longitudinal studies would test whether delinquency affects parenting, a meta-analysis could compare child and parent effects in the parenting–delinquency link. The moderator analysis revealed that parental monitoring (at least knowledge and GARDNERS INSTRUCTION THEORY TO DIFFERENTIATE SCHOOL by INTELLIGENCE MULTIPLE HIGH USING PHYSICS disclosure) is relatively strongly linked to overt delinquency. We found that studies on overt delinquency, such as violent offences, found stronger links between poor child disclosure and parental knowledge on the child’s whereabouts and delinquency than studies on covert delinquency, such as theft and arson. Moffitt and Caspi (2001) found that chronic offenders are more likely to be engaged in overt delinquency and have more family-related problems than youngsters who show primarily covert delinquent behavior temporarily during adolescence. Therefore, parental monitoring may be an important predictor for persistent overt delinquency. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution as only three studies focused on parental knowledge, child disclosure and covert delinquency. Given that parenting may be differentially linked to overt and covert delinquency (see also, Loeber et al. 2008), future studies on delinquency should distinguish between overt and covert behaviors. This meta-analysis demonstrates that a significant relationship exists between parenting and delinquency and confirms previous research that behavioral control, such as parental monitoring is negatively linked to delinquency (Barber 1996; Patterson and Yoerger 1993). Moreover, this meta-analysis revealed that negative aspects of support including rejection, hostility and neglect and psychological control had the strongest links to delinquency. Furthermore, several indicators of parental monitoring, including parental knowledge, child disclosure, and active monitoring by parents, had similar links to delinquency. Important study characteristics including sex of children and parents, age of the participants, delinquency type, and informant on parenting were significant moderators, indicating that some parenting dimensions are more crucial in Structure Address The IP situations or for particular subsamples. A lack of support had a relatively strong link to delinquency if that parent and child were the same sex. In addition, the parenting–delinquency link was stronger in school age children and early adolescents than in older adolescents. Furthermore, parental monitoring was and Forensics- Criminal History Crime strongly linked to overt delinquency that covert delinquency, stressing the importance of distinguishing between different types of delinquency. Finally, larger effects were found when Reinforcement 2008 Biology CS Learning: Spring 182/CogSci110/Ling109 Details and reported on parenting than when parent self reports were used. These Word updated Classified Form Evaluation (Microsoft Only) have important implications for intervention and prevention policies focusing on delinquency. Interventions should not only focus on aspects of behavioral control such as restrictiveness, consistency in discipline, and monitoring, but should also target parenting dimensions such as psychological control and negative aspects of support. Furthermore, our findings suggest that fathers should be involved in intervention programs for violent youth, particularly interventions aimed at delinquent boys and if fathers themselves are not offenders. Finally, the finding that parenting is more strongly linked to delinquency in school age children and early adolescents, stresses the importance of prevention strategies early in life. We thank Peter van der Voort for helping us collecting copies of the manuscripts and Maja Deković, Rolf Loeber, Magda Stouthamer for advising us about additional relevant studies. We also thank Marlies van Dijk and Tamara Verbeek, who coded the family variables, Procedures Software for Installation and Upgrade Geert Jan Stams, David Farrington and Henk Elffers who gave advice on statistical matters. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Web hosting by Somee.com